on Indonesia, the Last Five Years

“There will be those pissants who will want to urinate over everyone else’s freedoms and in that doing will use the very document that decrees freedom. To impede any attempt to do so, those who seek to take away the rights of others shall then have those same rights seized from them forthwith.”
~Thomas Jefferson

The Indonesian campaign is getting to its interesting bits. Three days to the polls, it’s time to decide for things. I’ve always been inclined for Mr. Yudhoyono but I now think it’s worth looking for an alternative. It’s simple really, I don’t think Mr. Yudhoyono can deliver.

One would probably say the other candidates similarly promised fairy tales. May be so – but in Mr. Yudhoyono’s case, his promises could easily be compared against his records. It’s the fine line between ambitious and negligence.

First off, the economy. Economy is the debate in this election when SBY announced his pick of running mate, Mr. Boediono, an economist. He was relative unknown and mostly non partisan with experience in previous cabinets. By all appearances this pair looks the most convincing. Almost presidential.

The record of Mr. SBY’s last five years is patchy at best. Ndoro Kakung has a summary of the economic indicators so you can check for yourself. For GDP growth The Government consistently missed the targets in all of the last four years.

Mr. SBY probably realized this and recruited Boediono from the Central Bank. While the impeccable Boediono is probably a very smart man, the Bank of Indonesia isn’t exactly a bastion of integrity. As a Bank, despite cutting interest rate for eight months in a row to 6.75%, the consumer rate remains more or less the same.

The central bank is a murky institution presently run by a successions of board members and senior officials, many of them, including a presidential in law, currently behind bars for graft and bribery and whatnots.

Where credentials go, the Governor of the central bank is probably not such an it job.

Finance Minister Sri Mulyani was asked in a Metro TV interview recently, if Indonesia could really perform better than 5%, as campaigned by the candidates. She seemed almost instinctively responding to the question with just a slight sense of urgency. She said the system needs a good set of rules in place. This is of course, up to the Parliament with which she said she had, “outstanding relationship.” Next was a consistent and fair enforcement of those rules. She is responsible for the economic policy and the Department of Finance so she would continue to do her job. The Finance Minister eased back a little before naming the third and said, “Luck.” Sri Mulyani suggested that we all pray for the better chance of getting it right.

The problem of getting it right is of course, you will eventually be out of business. She submitted her resignation once and was very nearly fired. The cabinet serves at the pleasure of the President but what if the President couldn’t get his cabinet to work together?

Economy isn’t just about fiscal and tax policy. On the last campaign SBY (and Kalla) promised “mega infrastructure projects” If Mr. President had managed to build a better public transport system Jakarta probably wouldn’t be halted up for his campaign rally yesterday. Five years ago, there was a promise for an enormous housing infrastructure: 1000 towers of cheap subsidized housing. How many of those got built: 5.
Or six, whatever, can’t remember but it’s nowhere damn near a thousand.

If Sri Mulyani was probably being modest, I think she was more likely being honest. It’s wonderful that it works but we still all need to pray.

In any event, the President now has his very own celebrity economist he’s probably not too worried about it.

The campaign’s other message is integrity. President SBY is totally committed to fighting corruption. There’s even a book about it. The KPK had done the wonderful job of delivering a steady stream of arresting headlines. It’s amazing how many big fish a single institution can do in one news cyle. The vibrant Indonesian press is literally tripping over for scoops on arrests these days.

In annual terms, the number’s closer to 40 forty cases a year with KPK’s current administration capacity. Multiply that with the number of crooks stupid enough to get arrested to feed the press junkie and you have an efficient approval churning machine. Compare the number to the number of crooks currently in the wild and you will see an institutional experiment in integrity.

Accountants call it slight rounding error - in the bigger scheme of things, fighting corruption in Indonesia is far from job well done.

By most measures however, KPK performs better than what was expected of them. The special body lends credibility to the leadership institution in this country. It gives meaning to justice and respect for the law and, for the first time in memory for most Indonesians, it gives hopes. By doing its job, KPK restored and reintroduced a sense of trust in the most corrupt country in the world and opened the way for more functioning and rewarding state. After decades of abuse by its leadership, it’s a nice and happy feeling.
The problem with getting things right this time however, is a more brutal and rude awakening for everyone. The once over popular KPK Chief is at the moment going to trial for masterminding an assassination of a big wig CEO, mafia style, after a complicated and scandalous affair involving a cutish golf caddy, a billionaire, a high ranking police officer and six goons on motorbikes with a backup team to clean up. I can’t be making this stuff up.

In a deliberate and vicious twist of the murder investigation – and somewhat buried under the election media circus - is the threat of criminal investigation of more KPK deputies, by the Indonesian Police Department. During the investigation of the murder case, the Police discovered that the victim and the mistress were both included in a set of numbers monitored by the KPK. Its senior officials were aware of this and now treated as persons of interests. What the Police really alludes here is that the murder was an institutional conduct, probably ran by some evil cabal and they’re bent in dismantling it.

The Police of course, suggested nothing of the sort. They were only pursuing their investigation, they said. Also, in a parallel twist, they have just learned that one of their own was allegedly wiretapped with a potentially very embarrassing – and probably criminal – conversation. Someone, somewhere, is running an illegal wiretap on the Police and the 3 star general promised a criminal investigation. How the murder investigation becomes one about illegal wiretapping is really, well, I’ve no idea. It just happens.

KPK’s authority to monitor suspicious numbers and investigate is clearly specified in laws and not without precedents. Audio records of phone conversation were used several times in court and everyone was more than happy to accept it – the police, the AGO, the court, the parliament, the ministries, the government and the public at large. Now that a Police general is tapped, the Police wants a criminal investigation? It just sounds very icky.

Considering that the chairman of the committee is already in jail, a mere threat of criminal investigation at that level really should require a higher degree of public scrutiny of the conducts and motives of those involved. If you think that a systematic attempt to dismantle KPK – and ongoing anti-corruption efforts – might seem a little farfetched, then look again (update: Tempo runs it on the cover this week).

Indeed, a lot of people, would probably speculate to do away with the whole KPK thing altogether. KPK made enough enemies in its sensationally brief history, many people would be happier to put an end to this out of control experiment. The election makes a perfect timing: everyone can campaign on the glorious days of putting thieves and crooks behind bars and make sure that such grievances won’t happen again in the future.

If SBY is sincerely committed to combating corruption then the circumstances really show a vastly different picture to wonderful campaign tunes. Like I said, I can’t make this stuff up.

The vengeful DPR took the first jab in attacking the wounded KPK by suggesting that it suspended any further ‘strategic decision” until a new anti-corruption czar is found and installed. Technically, of course, Chief of KPK must go through DPR so the honourable members are probably inclined to wait it out until the next term.

The anti corruption laws are currently due for renewal and the dateline is approaching fast. DPR needs a new set of laws to replace the existing ones or KPK (and the special anti corruption court) will be in a legal limbo. With Antasari in prison, the KPK is left decapitated and to function only with the remaining four deputies and now, an expiry date set right after the election.

DPR is in recess at the moment and unlikely to get the job done in time. SBY promised that he will issue an executive order if and when the time comes, but well, that is so conveniently past the vote counts and really, does Indonesia really want to go back to the days of Executive Orders?

SBY-Kalla government keeps a sufficient block in the parliament for the last five years (and still do ) they are supposedly equally committed to fighting corruption and yet they could not get the job done. Indeed, the DPR was in session last week and heard busy debating the next chairmanship – Partai Demokrat naturally wanting it for the winner of the election.

No less than the President himself made a statement in Kompas, seemingly worried about the ‘unchecked authority of the KPK’. If the soundbite was probably taken out of context, the timing couldn’t be tricker. A nosy audit was initiated and caught the headlines for a few days before quickly retreating back, KPK is already regularly audited and a number of external auditors are attached to its daily functions.

The Police is probably the most persistent – though I suspect AGO to jump into the fray pretty soon. In a Tempo interview this week, Susno Duadji proudly claim that he could bring down KPK, “this very evening.” If so he wishes. A police general is making an announcement that he could bring down KPK in one evening – two evening before people go to the polls. I’m scratching heads how this could even happen.

It is indeed, a sad state of affairs. While all three candidates dole out campaign promises like fortune cookies, SBY and Jusuf Kalla are set apart because they are also the sitting government. The President and his Vice President are first and foremost, responsible for running the country. Their campaign promises are hold to higher degree of scrutiny because voters and citizens can and will simply compare those promises to their action.

SBY promises Indonesia progress. One that will no longer be hindered and stalled by economic and political interests. Somewhat with a reformed and better functioning bureaucracy. One that could do better than others even in the best of times.
Lapindo is still a mess and the nation’s central bank is riddled in so many scandals, the directors were convicted of looting their ‘legal expenses’. He promises clean government and integrity while at the same time practically shutting down the whole anti corruption infrastructure in this country.

With this, they think they can run the country at 4.6%. Is it a wonder at all that everybody else say they can do better?


UPDATE: There's an article on The Economist on the Indonesian election, it reads more or less the same but maybe interesting for those of you who read the smart stuff.

 

10 comments:

  1. Rob Baiton said,

    I am guessing that you sent me the link in order that I would comment. If not, then too bad, I am commenting anyways! :D

    There is nothing much there that is new about the failure of the SBY regime. The fact is that his team has been very good at the media management level and most of the negative stuff has never seen widespread coverage.

    It is a simple case of, "it is better the least evil devil you know rather than the more evil devils on offer." The simple fact is that the other two tickets contain gentlemen with serious questions remaining about their involvement in the brutal suppression of the rights of ordinary Indonesians.

    SBY should have the same sharp spotlight directed on him as well when it comes to human rights violations. After all, at some of the key junctures he was "the man"!

    On the economic front. It is all spin. The idea that Indonesia is weathering the economic storm better than its neighbours is indicative of good economic management. The media has bought into this.

    I have written many times that SBY has been an abject failure. I garnered a few criticisms about not being Indonesian and therefore not understanding the dynamics of the Indonesian political scene. I am sure you can imagine what my response was to that one.

    The KPK is an interesting study in how the government is going about undermining with a view to dismantling an institution that has been one of its more successful endeavours.

    The endemic and systemic corruption in Indonesia is not a problem that can be undone in one, two or ten terms. It is, and must be, an ongoing work. Look at places like Hong Kong, Australia, and the like. Corruption still exists but there are mechanisms in place to deal with it, and normally these work pretty well.

    The question is then, "if SBY is such a corruption fighter, then why the concern now about the KPK?" Furthermore, why is he allowing his government to allow the parliament to stall the all important corruption court legislation?

    The man's record speaks for itself, and it doesn't say all the right or nice things that it must for a bloke who as the incumbent is allowing his campaign to suggest that he is a shoe in for a second term.

    Boediono was picked not because he is a reformer or a policy whiz or his work was complete at Bank Indonesia, he was picked for no other reason than he is not Jusuf Kalla.

    Boediono is simply not seen as being a threat. He is somebody who is expected to be a team player and knows his place.

    I do think though that you should be in the next cabinet. Then I might even be inclined to return to the great archipelago to the north of my homeland.

    on July 6, 2009 6:18 PM


  2. (Here here, I agree Rob!)

    As usual, an insightful and educating post.

    You have a wonderful brain and a gift for writing.

    on July 6, 2009 6:55 PM


  3. Jakartass said,

    Yes, a good post, Tree.

    It worries me that we are seeing a creeping back of Suhartoism - three smiling generals??

    The Post has covered the involvement of BIN, the state intelligence agency, in all three campaigns, which may be a major reason for Suciwati, Munir's widow, basically calling for a boycott of the election. With Muchdi, (sp?) acquitted of Munir's murder and now Prabowo's campaign manager, no-one can blame her.

    A few months back, I suggested that golput is a valid option, athough Rob disagreed.

    Due to a sudden family bereavement in Medan, my tribe will not be voting, but would have gone for SBY because "he's better than the rest". But is he?

    This is why I thought it important to post on the release of US government papers last week which suggest that SBY "probably" covered up the military - meaning Kopassus, no doubt Prabowo's pump priming source for his immense wealth - who were involved in the murder of the Freeport teachers back in 2002.

    Have any of the print media picked up on this?

    on July 7, 2009 6:02 AM


  4. Patrick said,

    What can I say? I agree with Rob (I usually do)that the question isn't whether Susilo will make a great president.

    He won't.

    The question is whether the others would be worse.

    In my humble submission they would.

    I had lunch with Megawati last week and I was astonished at her lack of charisma, her prevailing attitude that she was born to run this country, and that all this democratic election bullshit is beneath her, as are the people of the country and the foreigners who live here.

    Her running mate, Probowo, quite frankly, is a scary, dangerous, little man.

    Kalla/Wiranto? Kalla is a buffoon without a single workable idea and an ego that wouldn't fit into the Palace if it was coated with vaseline. Wiranto is yet another unrepentant war criminal who thinks that presidential debates are karaoke opportunities. I weep for this country.

    As I've said elsewhere, if I had a vote, I'd have to pinch my nose, vote for SBY and pray that karma doesn't send me back as an artichoke for my sin.

    Best,
    Patrick
    http://pagun-view.blogspot.com

    on July 7, 2009 9:38 AM


  5. treespotter said,

    Rob, Patrick, Jen, Jakartass: thanks for the comment. I do think this deserves a little more debate - particularly since the timing makes it an election sensitive issue.

    I put up a link to The Economist - the article points out to the neglect in behalf of the domestic media appetite in looking too close at the incumbent's rapport.

    I think Boediono is in place because SBY needs a celebrity economist to keep handy just in case he loses anymore of his staff to malevolent private and/or political interests.

    To be perfectly honest, i am probably least concerned of the 'security' threats - security apparatus or military interests - in the election. The Soeharto days are long gone and Indonesia is a different animal these days.

    Neither Prabowo or Wiranto shouldn't be allowed in the race for their past military records alone, but in any events, both of them went through some sort of due process already. Wiranto made peace with the East Timorese (through the reconciliation efforts etc) and Prabowo through a military tribunal. Some people will not be happy with the result (myself included) but then again, I look forward to have Dick Cheney in court but most likely, we won't see him there.

    I'm not sure how Jusuf Kalla got dragged into this mud however. Sure enough his mannerism is rather annoying and slightly gnomish in appearance but he's hardly without 'a single workable idea'.

    All things considered, it is a very difficult choice but I am most reluctant to see any of these characters to consolidate so much power so early in Indonesia.

    SBY wants his own VP, his own Cabinet and his support base is aggressively consolidating their influence in the parliament. It's a smug and uneasy feeling to see another General doing it so quickly after we got rid of the last one.

    on July 7, 2009 10:09 AM


  6. Rob Baiton said,

    J...

    I think when we were talking about golput as being a valid option we were talking about the general election.

    Here, I still think Indonesians should vote. This is particularly the case if they have the right to vote. Much has gone into the cause to see ordinary Indonesians gain that right.

    However, I am not necessarily against the idea of "stabbing" all six in the face on election day. Do Indonesians still nyoblos?

    Tree...

    I am pretty sure that there is still an Interpol "red notice" out on Wiranto. And, if I am not mistaken this is the reason for his reluctance to travel abroad.

    On the Boediono front. I am not sure that he is the "right kind" of celebrity economist. If SBY was really into a celebrity economist with gravitas then he probably should have gone with SMI. Hence, my reasoning that Boediono is there as a team man and nothing more.

    This post really is worthy of more discussion. I especially enjoy the Jefferson quote and that quote is probably worthy of some discussion in its own right :D

    on July 7, 2009 5:24 PM


  7. treespotter said,

    I would not be voting, frankly, i can't choose one for myself. Best among the horrible isn't good enough. Not for SBY (for these reason)but JK Wiranto isn't exactly one to rally for either. Then i won't be voting (though Verbal is responsible for the voting booths in my area).

    rob: I understand your point about much have gone into gaining the rights to vote - then again the rights allow me to choose for myself. choice sucks.

    As for the celebrity economist, my theory is precisely because SMI isn't available, the President may need another celebrity economist, just in case SMI fails to work together with his future cabinet.

    Watch this space :)


    and well, yes, the Jefferson quote. I think that was from a letter he sent to Ben Franklin. He has a way with language, plus he knows a thing or two about these things, so uh, well...

    on July 7, 2009 7:02 PM


  8. anong said,

    Pat

    I wouldnt have thought one would have to have lunch with Megs to have gleaned that information?

    on July 7, 2009 9:08 PM


  9. Patrick said,

    No, I didn't HAVE to have lunch with her to glean that information. Sitting beside her merely confirmed that the attitude was not just the way she comes across on TV, but is an accurate reflection of her personality.

    Just by way of example, the lunch was hosted by the Jakarta Foreign Correspondents Club, and her first words when she addressed the foreign press corps were something to the effect that as foreigners we know nothing worth printing about Indonesia and never will.

    Charmless bitch.

    on July 13, 2009 6:40 AM


  10. Jakartass said,

    Just curious, Pat but in what language did HRH Mega utter that thoughtless remark?

    And do you think she'll get invited again?

    on July 13, 2009 3:17 PM